🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about the comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was understandable. Rather, he invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all love a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in press after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three players in the world back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed number four in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are more than enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the alarming speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of American men winning major titles when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after break point, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, who lost to Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America not produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {