🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.